all marketsCat FoodWet Cat Food
San Francisco · 2 grocers · Contested

the wet cat food aisle

San Francisco's wet cat food aisle is a competitive shelf with clear leaders: 53 products from 7 brands across 2 grocers. wellness owns the most shelf — 38% of SKUs, ahead of i and love and you. The shelf leans dairy-free — 25% of SKUs carry that claim. Verdict: contested — real competition, no single winner (opportunity 67/100).

53
products
7
brands
$3.09
avg price
$2.19–$5.02
typical range

More in Cat Food

Who owns the shelf

brands by share of the wet cat food shelf.

wellness
38% of shelf20 SKUs
i and love and you
23% of shelf12 SKUs
birdie & louie
19% of shelf10 SKUs
ffancy feast
11% of shelf6 SKUs
mmerrick
4% of shelf2 SKUs
tthe honest kitchen
4% of shelf2 SKUs
ppure cravings
2% of shelf1 SKU

How it's positioned

the claims products on this shelf lead with — share of SKUs carrying each.

Dairy-Free
25%
Gluten-Free
25%
Not vegan
25%
Seed-Oil-Free
15%
High-Protein
8%
Muscle & Performance
8%

Brand positioning

every brand by share of shelf × price. bubble size = the brand's total reach across all aisles; color = positioning stance. top-right owns the premium end; bottom-right owns the mainstream.

scale
premium leadersmainstream leadersniche premiumvalue playersshare of shelfavg $/oz
Color:no dominant segmentation on this shelf
Size:total brand reach (SKUs across all aisles)
price normalized per oz (sizes vary)

All stores combined. Tap a store to see who wins its shelf.

Market structure

32
low
Brand competition
how many brands compete
64
med
Variety of offers
how differentiated the shelf is
25
low
Top-brand grip
how much a few brands dominate
67
high
Launch whitespace
room for a new brand

store-brand share: 0% · scores 0–100.

More aisles

how we measure.prices & assortment are collected from public storefronts of San Franciscogrocers, deduped to distinct products, and normalized to a per-unit price from each product's parsed size. market-structure scores come from brand shares. figures update as we re-measure. full methodology →