all marketsCondimentsTahini Sesame Paste
San Francisco · 3 grocers · Greenfield

the tahini sesame paste aisle

San Francisco's tahini sesame paste aisle is a competitive shelf with clear leaders: 12 products from 7 brands across 3 grocers. tarazi owns the most shelf — 42% of SKUs, ahead of joyva. The shelf leans organic — 33% of SKUs carry that claim. Verdict: greenfield — wide open — room for a new brand (opportunity 73/100).

12
products
7
brands
$13.32
avg price
$11.09–$16.39
typical range

More in Condiments

Who owns the shelf

brands by share of the tahini sesame paste shelf.

ttarazi
42% of shelf5 SKUs
jjoyva
17% of shelf2 SKUs
aartisana
8% of shelf1 SKU
mmid east
8% of shelf1 SKU
once again
8% of shelf1 SKU
kkevala
8% of shelf1 SKU
cadia
8% of shelf1 SKU

How it's positioned

the claims products on this shelf lead with — share of SKUs carrying each.

Organic
33%
Minimally Processed
17%
Peanut-Free
17%
Plant-Based
17%
Vegan
17%
Muscle & Performance
8%
High-Protein
8%

Brand positioning

every brand by share of shelf × price. bubble size = the brand's total reach across all aisles; color = positioning stance. top-right owns the premium end; bottom-right owns the mainstream.

scale
premium leadersmainstream leadersniche premiumvalue playersshare of shelfavg $/oz
Color:indulgentbetter-for-you
Size:total brand reach (SKUs across all aisles)
price normalized per oz (sizes vary)3 omitted (no oz size)

All stores combined. Tap a store to see who wins its shelf.

Market structure

32
low
Brand competition
how many brands compete
45
med
Variety of offers
how differentiated the shelf is
24
low
Top-brand grip
how much a few brands dominate
73
high
Launch whitespace
room for a new brand

store-brand share: 0% · scores 0–100.

More aisles

how we measure.prices & assortment are collected from public storefronts of San Franciscogrocers, deduped to distinct products, and normalized to a per-unit price from each product's parsed size. market-structure scores come from brand shares. figures update as we re-measure. full methodology →