all marketsPrepared ChickenOther Prepared Chicken
San Francisco · 3 grocers · Own-brand led

the other prepared chicken aisle

San Francisco's other prepared chicken aisle is a competitive shelf with clear leaders: 25 products from 5 brands across 3 grocers. bi-rite market owns the most shelf — 48% of SKUs. Store brands hold 64%. The shelf leans gluten-free — 8% of SKUs carry that claim. Verdict: own-brand led — the store's own private label owns the shelf (opportunity 46/100).

25
products
5
brands
$15.52
avg price
$7.29–$27.28
typical range

More in Prepared Chicken

Who owns the shelf

brands by share of the other prepared chicken shelf.

bi-rite marketPL
48% of shelf12 SKUs
luke’s localPL
16% of shelf4 SKUs
mary's
4% of shelf1 SKU
mmore than gourmet
4% of shelf1 SKU
true story
4% of shelf1 SKU

How it's positioned

the claims products on this shelf lead with — share of SKUs carrying each.

Gluten-Free
8%
High-Protein
4%
Low sugar
4%
Minimally Processed
4%
Not vegan
4%
Paleo
4%
Dairy-Free
4%
Seed-Oil-Free
4%

Brand positioning

every brand by share of shelf × price. bubble size = the brand's total reach across all aisles; color = positioning stance. top-right owns the premium end; bottom-right owns the mainstream.

scale
premium leadersmainstream leadersniche premiumvalue playersshare of shelfavg price
Color:indulgentbetter-for-you
Size:total brand reach (SKUs across all aisles)
Shape:nationalstore brand

All stores combined. Tap a store to see who wins its shelf.

Market structure

24
low
Brand competition
how many brands compete
76
high
Variety of offers
how differentiated the shelf is
26
low
Top-brand grip
how much a few brands dominate
46
med
Launch whitespace
room for a new brand

store-brand share: 64% · scores 0–100.

More aisles

how we measure.prices & assortment are collected from public storefronts of San Franciscogrocers, deduped to distinct products, and normalized to a per-unit price from each product's parsed size. market-structure scores come from brand shares. figures update as we re-measure. full methodology →