all marketsFrozen MealsFrozen Burritos
San Francisco · 2 grocers · Contested

the frozen burritos aisle

San Francisco's frozen burritos aisle is a fragmented shelf spread across many brands: 15 products from 5 brands across 2 grocers. amy's kitchen owns the most shelf — 27% of SKUs, ahead of red's. Store brands hold 13%. The shelf leans vegetarian — 40% of SKUs carry that claim. Verdict: contested — real competition, no single winner (opportunity 46/100).

15
products
5
brands
$6.52
avg price
$4.39–$11.09
typical range

More in Frozen Meals

Who owns the shelf

brands by share of the frozen burritos shelf.

amy's kitchen
27% of shelf4 SKUs
rred's
27% of shelf4 SKUs
eevol
13% of shelf2 SKUs
gus'sPL
13% of shelf2 SKUs
bbettr bowl
7% of shelf1 SKU

How it's positioned

the claims products on this shelf lead with — share of SKUs carrying each.

Vegetarian
40%
Plant-Based
40%
Organic
27%
Low sugar
13%
Dairy-Free
13%
Not vegan
13%
Gluten-Free
13%
High-Protein
13%

Brand positioning

every brand by share of shelf × price. bubble size = the brand's total reach across all aisles; color = positioning stance. top-right owns the premium end; bottom-right owns the mainstream.

scale
premium leadersmainstream leadersniche premiumvalue playersshare of shelfavg $/oz
Color:indulgentbetter-for-you
Size:total brand reach (SKUs across all aisles)
Shape:nationalstore brand
price normalized per oz (sizes vary)1 omitted (no oz size)

All stores combined. Tap a store to see who wins its shelf.

Market structure

24
low
Brand competition
how many brands compete
77
high
Variety of offers
how differentiated the shelf is
18
low
Top-brand grip
how much a few brands dominate
46
med
Launch whitespace
room for a new brand

store-brand share: 13% · scores 0–100.

More aisles

how we measure.prices & assortment are collected from public storefronts of San Franciscogrocers, deduped to distinct products, and normalized to a per-unit price from each product's parsed size. market-structure scores come from brand shares. figures update as we re-measure. full methodology →